Project your ABM, outbound and inbound results with realistic assumptions.
Estimate qualified meetings, pipeline and closed deals in three scenarios, then compare them with the full program cost: license, credits, ads, team and tools.
ALL FIGURES IN USDResults calculator
Rates are market assumptions taken from public industry benchmarks. They are not Lymera customer results or a guarantee.
How we calculate these numbers
Every assumption is visible and explained here. If something does not match your operation, change it in the controls or talk it through with us.
Volume and capacity
1 SDR works ≈ 50 new ABM accounts a month, 1 BDR works ≈ 400 outbound contacts and 1 inbound BDR works ≈ 100 ad leads. If you assign fewer people than the volume requires, the projector cuts the volume instead of inflating the result.
Growth 360 maturity
Month 1 is setup and produces no meetings. After that, effectiveness rises with the size of your accounts up to 100%. Costs run in full from the first month.
Real-world cycles
ABM spreads the meetings from each cohort of accounts over 4 months. Deals close after your sales cycle. Anything that falls outside the window is shown as open pipeline and is not counted as closed. With high-ticket deals, 6 to 12-month cycles are common: use the 24-month horizon.
Ads (paid inbound)
Each channel (Google, Meta and LinkedIn) turns your monthly spend into leads using a cost per lead by scenario. The benchmarks are U.S.-based and for a mid-size ticket; for LATAM they are multiplied by 0.4, and segment and average ACV adjust them (costlier the larger the accounts and the contract). Each lead becomes a qualified meeting at its channel's rate, then an opportunity and a deal at shared rates. Month 1 is setup: spend starts in month 2 and leads mature over 5 months.
Credits
Each outbound and ABM contact receives a sequence of 11 emails and 5 LinkedIn messages, is prospected (3) and is re-scored 2 times. Those who converse (10% in outbound and 15% in ABM) add AI replies by email and LinkedIn and a WhatsApp conversation (8). Each ABM account uses 5 on enrollment plus 16 for AI actions, and each ad lead 13. Per product you add sequence regeneration (3 campaigns per active channel; each message is regenerated 5 times at 2 credits), the Intelligence Engine and Playbooks (147) and, on Growth and Enterprise, Operations (920). Re-scoring is our own assumption: it has no published rate. Apollo enrichment is billed separately by pack: 1 credit per contact (email) plus 8 for the phone of those who move to WhatsApp. If you exceed the plan pool, extra credits are bought in packs. Per-action rates are on the Pricing page.
Total cost
It adds up the license at your billing cycle, the ABM Hub if you need it, extra credits, the LinkedIn profiles you choose, the WhatsApp Marketing pack (calculated from your volume and destination country, or chosen by you), the Make add-on if you connect platforms through webhooks, enrichment, ad spend and its setup, onboarding and, only if you turn it on, the fully loaded team cost. Costs run in full from month 1; ad spend starts in month 2.
Cost per lead and conversion rates by scenario
| Channel | Stage | Conservative | Expected | Optimistic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outbound | Contact → conversation (positive reply) | 2.0% | 3.0% | 4.5% |
| Outbound | Conversation → qualified meeting | 30.0% | 40.0% | 50.0% |
| Outbound | Qualified meeting → opportunity | 45.0% | 55.0% | 65.0% |
| Outbound | Opportunity → closed deal | 18.0% | 25.0% | 32.0% |
| ABM | New account → qualified meeting | 6.0% | 8.0% | 9.0% |
| ABM | Qualified meeting → opportunity | 55.0% | 62.0% | 70.0% |
| ABM | Opportunity → closed deal | 25.0% | 33.0% | 42.0% |
| Google Ads | Cost per lead (USD, U.S. market) | $150 | $100 | $70 |
| Google Ads | Lead → qualified meeting | 8.0% | 12.0% | 16.0% |
| Meta Ads | Cost per lead (USD, U.S. market) | $120 | $70 | $35 |
| Meta Ads | Lead → qualified meeting | 4.0% | 6.0% | 9.0% |
| LinkedIn Ads | Cost per lead (USD, U.S. market) | $300 | $200 | $110 |
| LinkedIn Ads | Lead → qualified meeting | 9.0% | 14.0% | 19.0% |
| Inbound (ads) | Qualified meeting → opportunity | 30.0% | 40.0% | 50.0% |
| Inbound (ads) | Opportunity → closed deal | 12.0% | 18.0% | 24.0% |
Average ACV adjusts the close rate: larger contracts are less likely to close. Costs per lead are U.S. market; for LATAM they are multiplied by 0.4, and segment and ACV adjust them. For Enterprise accounts, the meeting → opportunity rate is also multiplied by 0.86 in every channel and the lead → meeting rate of the ads by 0.8 (the tables show Mid-market account rates). Lymera assumptions: those adjustments, and that meeting → opportunity and close rates are higher in outbound and ABM than in ads; public benchmarks do not distinguish them clearly. Rates are market assumptions taken from public industry benchmarks. They are not Lymera customer results or a guarantee.
What people ask about the projector
Is this a guarantee of results?
Where do the conversion rates come from?
Why does month 1 produce no meetings?
Why does ABM take longer than outbound?
What does the total cost include, and what does it leave out?
How are the Google, Meta and LinkedIn ads calculated?
Do I need one LinkedIn profile per person?
Why do I see so few closed deals in 12 months with a long sales cycle?
How does the projector decide which plan I need?
Why is the result closed ACV and not profit?
Can I see the scenario with my own numbers?
Want to check this scenario against your own data?
Share your details and we will review your ICP, your volume and your sales cycle together before you commit any budget.